Title
A study of Rayleigh Fading Channel Models: And Comparison of Different Models for the Analysis of Rayleigh Fading Channels,Used
Sold by Ergodebooks, an authorized reseller.
Returns accepted within 30 days | support@ergodebooks.com
Shipping Information
- Free Standard Shipping — United States only
- Processing Time: 1–3 business days
- Estimated Delivery: 3–5 business days after dispatch
- Double-boxed, fully insured & discreetly packaged
- Tracking number sent via email once dispatched
- Orders over $250 require signature upon delivery. Taxes calculated at checkout.
Returns & Refund
Returns accepted within 30 days of delivery.
Damaged or Defective Item
Free return shipping + replacement or full refund
Wrong Item Received
Free return shipping + replacement or full refund
Change of Mind
Return shipping at customer's expense · 25% restocking fee applies
These days, computer simulation is increasingly being used for design and performance evaluation of communication systems. When simulating a mobile wireless channel for such systems, it is usually assumed that the fading process is a random variate with Rayleigh distribution. In this paper, we have tried to understand Rayleigh Fading (which best describes the scenario inan urban or macrocell environment) better by comparing different models and observing the changes that are caused by varying different parameters. At present, there are a number of methods to generate the Rayleigh fadingprocess, some of them quite recently proposed. Due to the use of different Rayleigh fading generators, different simulations of the same communication system yield different results. Two methods, viz., the Jakes method and the Dent(Modified Jakes) method have been studied, simulated and compared based on the Rayleigh fading process properties. Various communication systems have been simulated using the Rayleigh fading generators and the differences in theresults, if any, have been analyzed. It was seen that the Dent method is usually seen to better describe a Rayleigh fading process.
⚠️ WARNING (California Proposition 65):
This product may contain chemicals known to the State of California to cause cancer, birth defects, or other reproductive harm.
For more information, please visit www.P65Warnings.ca.gov.