Adolescent Emotion Regulation Questionnaire: Development and Validation of a Measure of Emotion Regulation for Adolescents,Used

Adolescent Emotion Regulation Questionnaire: Development and Validation of a Measure of Emotion Regulation for Adolescents,Used

In Stock
SKU: DADAX3659345369
Brand: LAP Lambert Academic Publishing
Sale price$112.66 Regular price$160.94
Save $48.28
Quantity
Add to wishlist
Add to compare

Processing time: 1-3 days

US Orders Ships in: 3-5 days

International Orders Ships in: 8-12 days

Return Policy: 15-days return on defective items

Payment Option
Payment Methods

Help

If you have any questions, you are always welcome to contact us. We'll get back to you as soon as possible, withing 24 hours on weekdays.

Customer service

All questions about your order, return and delivery must be sent to our customer service team by e-mail at yourstore@yourdomain.com

Sale & Press

If you are interested in selling our products, need more information about our brand or wish to make a collaboration, please contact us at press@yourdomain.com

Over the past decade, emotion regulation (ER) has gained significant attention. This book details the development of the Adolescent Emotion Regulation Questionnaire (AERQ), which involved testing the validity of wellknown theoretical premises of emotion regulation within the structure of a measure of emotion regulation for adolescents. The items were designed to measure ER strategies in cognitive, behavioral, physiological, and social response domains; intensity or duration emotional features; and pleasant or unpleasant emotional valances. The 80 item measure was administered to 364 adolescents between the ages of 12 17 in Greater Edmonton. Confirmatory factor analysis did not support the hypothesized structure based on wellknown premises of ER theory. An exploratory factor analysis revealed a 4 factor model that distinguished between pleasant and unpleasant emotional valances; cognitive and physiological response domains within the unpleasant emotional valance; as well as a complex social factor. Convergent and divergent validity was supported. Although logical in nature, existing premises of ER theory are neither practical nor sustainable considering these new developments.

⚠️ WARNING (California Proposition 65):

This product may contain chemicals known to the State of California to cause cancer, birth defects, or other reproductive harm.

For more information, please visit www.P65Warnings.ca.gov.

Recently Viewed