Agency Merger And Bureaucratic Redesign,New

Agency Merger And Bureaucratic Redesign,New

Out of Stock
SKU: DADAX0822985020
Brand: University of Pittsburgh Press
Sale price$46.77 Regular price$66.81
Sold out Save $20.04
Quantity
Add to wishlist
Add to compare

Processing time: 1-3 days

US Orders Ships in: 3-5 days

International Orders Ships in: 8-12 days

Return Policy: 15-days return on defective items

Payment Option
Payment Methods

Help

If you have any questions, you are always welcome to contact us. We'll get back to you as soon as possible, withing 24 hours on weekdays.

Customer service

All questions about your order, return and delivery must be sent to our customer service team by e-mail at yourstore@yourdomain.com

Sale & Press

If you are interested in selling our products, need more information about our brand or wish to make a collaboration, please contact us at press@yourdomain.com

Product Description Since the expansion of public programs in the 1960s, charges of bureaucratic inefficiency, unresponsiveness, and red tape have been rampant. The response has often been extensive reorganization in an effort to change the source of control, carry out specific missions, and to achieve greater interagency cooperation. Karen M. Hult examines why these restructurings often fail, through three case studies: the U.S. Department of Housing and Urban Design (HUD); the Minnesota Department of Energy, Planning, and Development; and the Minneapolis Community Development Agency. Hult's study assesses the usefulness of mergers and reorganizations as a policy tool, and offers a valuable contribution to the study of public management and organization design. Review Hult's book features comparison of three different institutions, all of which were intentionally merged. . . . taken from different levels of governance: the U.S. Department of Housing and Urban Development; the Minnesota Department of Energy, Planning, and Development; and the Minneapolis Community Development Agency. . . . Wellorganized, welldocumented, and in plain English, not impenetrable jargon, and so accessible to many difference audiences.American Political Science Review About the Author Karen M. Hult is professor of political science at Virginia Polytechnic Institute and State University.

⚠️ WARNING (California Proposition 65):

This product may contain chemicals known to the State of California to cause cancer, birth defects, or other reproductive harm.

For more information, please visit www.P65Warnings.ca.gov.

Recently Viewed