ASSESSING METACOGNITIVE EXPERTISE: USING THE METACOGNITIVE EXPERTISE ASSESSMENT TOOL AS A PREDICTIVE SCALE FOR ACADEMIC ACHIEVEM,Used

ASSESSING METACOGNITIVE EXPERTISE: USING THE METACOGNITIVE EXPERTISE ASSESSMENT TOOL AS A PREDICTIVE SCALE FOR ACADEMIC ACHIEVEM,Used

In Stock
SKU: DADAX3843387532
Brand: LAP Lambert Academic Publishing
Condition: New
$98.73
Quantity
Add to wishlist
Add to compare
Sold by Ergodebooks, an authorized reseller.

Processing time: 1-3 days

US Orders Ships in: 3-5 days

International Orders Ships in: 8-12 days

Return Policy: 15-days return on defective items

Payment Option
Payment Methods

Help

If you have any questions, you are always welcome to contact us. We'll get back to you as soon as possible, withing 24 hours on weekdays.

Customer service

All questions about your order, return and delivery must be sent to our customer service team by e-mail at yourstore@yourdomain.com

Sale & Press

If you are interested in selling our products, need more information about our brand or wish to make a collaboration, please contact us at press@yourdomain.com

Over the last 20 years there has been a proliferation of research on metacognition and its connection to specific variables. Questions remain regarding what combinations of subcomponents of metacognition contribute to the development of metacognitive expertise (ME) in high achievers, whether a multicomponential model of ME can be delineated and proven through additional research, and whether a scale can be developed to assess learners' ME so as to identify low achievers (atrisk learners). To answer these questions the researcher (a) designed a new model of ME by exploring Metacognitive Domains and Component Factors; (b) developed a scale, the Metacognitive Expertise Assessment Tool (MEAT), and tested its reliability in comparison to the wellrespected MAI; and (c) established the MEAT's value as a predictive measure of ME. Overall, the findings revealed that three of the Metacognitive Domains and all 10 of the Component Factor predictors significantly discriminated low achievers from high achievers, whereas the MAI did not significantly discriminate low achievers from high achievers.

⚠️ WARNING (California Proposition 65):

This product may contain chemicals known to the State of California to cause cancer, birth defects, or other reproductive harm.

For more information, please visit www.P65Warnings.ca.gov.

Recently Viewed