Autonomy, relatedness and ethics: Perspectives from researchers, community members and community representatives,Used

Autonomy, relatedness and ethics: Perspectives from researchers, community members and community representatives,Used

In Stock
SKU: DADAX3848432005
Brand: LAP Lambert Academic Publishing
Sale price$98.73 Regular price$141.04
Save $42.31
Quantity
Add to wishlist
Add to compare

Processing time: 1-3 days

US Orders Ships in: 3-5 days

International Orders Ships in: 8-12 days

Return Policy: 15-days return on defective items

Payment Option
Payment Methods

Help

If you have any questions, you are always welcome to contact us. We'll get back to you as soon as possible, withing 24 hours on weekdays.

Customer service

All questions about your order, return and delivery must be sent to our customer service team by e-mail at yourstore@yourdomain.com

Sale & Press

If you are interested in selling our products, need more information about our brand or wish to make a collaboration, please contact us at press@yourdomain.com

This study explored the ways in which different stakeholders, namely researchers, community members and representatives define and understand ethically problematic scenarios. The intention was to understand the tensions within ethical decisionmaking as a result of the competing conceptions of the self, namely, autonomous and relational conceptions of the self. The assumption was that peoples participation in various cultural systems has a bearing on their definitions of what constituted ethical and moral behaviour (Markus & Kitayama, 1991; Matsumoto, 2003, 2006; Triandis, 1989). A hypothetical case scenario, mirroring real life experience circumstances, followed by a set of questions; was developed and used in an interviews. Thematic analysis was employed in the analysis of data from the interviews. Results show that all stakeholders have a common conception, but different justification, of what constitutes ethical dilemmas. The results also show that stakeholders subscribe to a communal view of the self. They also spoke highly of the communal way of decisionmaking and showed disappointment in the erosion of some of the indigenous epistemologies to make way Western epistemology.

⚠️ WARNING (California Proposition 65):

This product may contain chemicals known to the State of California to cause cancer, birth defects, or other reproductive harm.

For more information, please visit www.P65Warnings.ca.gov.

Recently Viewed