Characterization of Fluvial Reservoir Analogs: Modeling and Inversion of Petrophysical and Electrical Properties,Used

Characterization of Fluvial Reservoir Analogs: Modeling and Inversion of Petrophysical and Electrical Properties,Used

In Stock
SKU: DADAX3838317580
Brand: LAP Lambert Academic Publishing
$106.33 $151.90
Save $45.57
Quantity
Add to wishlist
Add to compare

Processing time: 1-3 days

US Orders Ships in: 3-5 days

International Orders Ships in: 8-12 days

Return Policy: 15-days return on defective items

Payment Option
Payment Methods

Help

If you have any questions, you are always welcome to contact us. We'll get back to you as soon as possible, withing 24 hours on weekdays.

Customer service

All questions about your order, return and delivery must be sent to our customer service team by e-mail at yourstore@yourdomain.com

Sale & Press

If you are interested in selling our products, need more information about our brand or wish to make a collaboration, please contact us at press@yourdomain.com

3D GPR data tested stratigraphic and structural imaging of the nearsurface. These data were integrated with geologic data to characterize a reservoir analog. GPR reflection times and amplitude distributions were used to generate a geostatistical model of sedimentary structures. Fluid permeabilities were assigned to sedimentary structures and were constrained by borehole and outcrop data. Reservoir properties were analyzed and petrographic analysis produced data on porosity, lithology, and cementation. Clay fraction, permeability, porosity, and water content were predicted from electrical properties. Permittivities were predicted by effective medium models. Dissociated phase models and coated grain models inverted for water saturation and water permittivity. Effective permittivities are lithology dependent and porosity influences permittivity sensitivity. Permittivity from the Maxwell_Garnett (MG) theory and the differential effective medium (DEM) theory were compared with a finiteelement (FE) implementation of multipole theory. MG model predictions in a porous medium are inadequate for multipole polarization. Permittivity predictions for DEM and FE models are very similar.

⚠️ WARNING (California Proposition 65):

This product may contain chemicals known to the State of California to cause cancer, birth defects, or other reproductive harm.

For more information, please visit www.P65Warnings.ca.gov.

Recently Viewed