Title
Comparing the Efficiency of Fixed and Tracking Solar Cell Panels: in a Tropical Location,Used
Sold by Ergodebooks, an authorized reseller.
Returns accepted within 30 days | support@ergodebooks.com
Shipping Information
- Free Standard Shipping — United States only
- Processing Time: 1–3 business days
- Estimated Delivery: 3–5 business days after dispatch
- Double-boxed, fully insured & discreetly packaged
- Tracking number sent via email once dispatched
- Orders over $250 require signature upon delivery. Taxes calculated at checkout.
Returns & Refund
Returns accepted within 30 days of delivery.
Damaged or Defective Item
Free return shipping + replacement or full refund
Wrong Item Received
Free return shipping + replacement or full refund
Change of Mind
Return shipping at customer's expense · 25% restocking fee applies
Payment Option
Monocrystalline, polycrystalline and amorphous silicon solar cell panels were installed on fixed and tracking rigs to determine which solar cell panel type and mounting arrangement (fixed or tracking) is optimum. This study was conducted at Nakhon Ratchasima Rajabhat University, Thailand, which has a tropical climate. The fixed panel rig was positioned at a tilt angle of 30, facing south. The tracking panel rig tracked the sun using a scope sensor linked to a microcontroller. Performance of the solar cell panels was determined via an average conversion efficiency over one year. This study also takes into account the effects of ambient air temperature and wind speed close to the solar cell panels. Based on the economical and maintenance aspects, the fixed solar cell panels have advantages over tracking solar cell panels.The monocrystalline solar cell panel has an economical advantage over the polycrystalline and amorphous solar panels.
⚠️ WARNING (California Proposition 65):
This product may contain chemicals known to the State of California to cause cancer, birth defects, or other reproductive harm.
For more information, please visit www.P65Warnings.ca.gov.