Title
Comparison of GLM, GEE and GLMM: a case Jimma infant longitudinal study,Used
Sold by Ergodebooks, an authorized reseller.
Returns accepted within 30 days | support@ergodebooks.com
Shipping Information
- Free Standard Shipping — United States only
- Processing Time: 1–3 business days
- Estimated Delivery: 3–5 business days after dispatch
- Double-boxed, fully insured & discreetly packaged
- Tracking number sent via email once dispatched
- Orders over $250 require signature upon delivery. Taxes calculated at checkout.
Returns & Refund
Returns accepted within 30 days of delivery.
Damaged or Defective Item
Free return shipping + replacement or full refund
Wrong Item Received
Free return shipping + replacement or full refund
Change of Mind
Return shipping at customer's expense · 25% restocking fee applies
Payment Option
Next to continuous outcomes, counts, binary and binomial outcomes take a prominent place in applied modeling and the corresponding methodological literature. It is common to place such models within the generalized linear modeling (GLM) framework. One of the main reasons for extending this family is the accommodation of hierarchical structure in the data, stemming from clustering in the data which, in turn, may result from repeatedly measuring the outcome, for various members of the same family. The correlation resulting from the clustering is often accommodated through the inclusion of random subjectspecific effects. Though not always, one conventionally assumes such random effects to be normally distributed. The repeated structure can be also accommodated by allowing a working correlation structure which leads to Generalized estimation equations. This study starts from the broad class of generalized linear models, accommodating clustering through a set of subject specific random effects. The methodology is applied to a longitudinal binary data from the south western Infants Longitudinal Growth Study.
⚠️ WARNING (California Proposition 65):
This product may contain chemicals known to the State of California to cause cancer, birth defects, or other reproductive harm.
For more information, please visit www.P65Warnings.ca.gov.