If you have any questions, you are always welcome to contact us. We'll get back to you as soon as possible, withing 24 hours on weekdays.
Customer service
All questions about your order, return and delivery must be sent to our customer service team by e-mail at yourstore@yourdomain.com
Sale & Press
If you are interested in selling our products, need more information about our brand or wish to make a collaboration, please contact us at press@yourdomain.com
Help
If you have any questions, you are always welcome to contact us. We'll get back to you as soon as possible, withing 24 hours on weekdays.
Customer service
All questions about your order, return and delivery must be sent to our customer service team by e-mail at yourstore@yourdomain.com
Sale & Press
If you are interested in selling our products, need more information about our brand or wish to make a collaboration, please contact us at press@yourdomain.com
When the first President Bush chose David Hackett Souter for the Supreme Court in 1990, the slender New Englander with the shy demeanor and ambiguous past was quickly dubbed a stealth candidate. Since his appointment, Souter has embraced a flexible, evolving, and highly pragmatic judicial style that embraces a high regard for precedenteven liberal decisions of the Warren and Burger Courts with which he may have personally disagreed. Ultimately, Yarbrough contends, Souter has become the principal Rehnquist Court opponent of the originalist, textbound jurisprudence that many of the more conservative Justices profess to champion. Sifting through Souters opinions, papers of the Justices contemporaries and other relevant records and interviews, esteemed Supreme Court biographer Tinsley Yarbrough here gives us the real David Souter, crafting a fascinating account of one of the heretofore most elusive Justices in the history of the Court.
⚠️ WARNING (California Proposition 65):
This product may contain chemicals known to the State of California to cause cancer,
birth defects, or other reproductive harm.
I picked this book up hoping for a deep dive, but it felt a bit dry at times. The traditional Republican view on the Court's decisions is fascinating, but sometimes I struggled to stay engaged. Still, if you’re into legal history, it could be worth a read.
A
Angela Wu
Interesting Perspective but Not for Everyone
I picked this book up hoping for a deep dive, but it felt a bit dry at times. The traditional Republican view on the Court's decisions is fascinating, but sometimes I struggled to stay engaged. Still, if you’re into legal history, it could be worth a read.
A
Angela Wu
Interesting Perspective but Not for Everyone
I picked this book up hoping for a deep dive, but it felt a bit dry at times. The traditional Republican view on the Court's decisions is fascinating, but sometimes I struggled to stay engaged. Still, if you’re into legal history, it could be worth a read.
C
Carlos Mendez
A Thought-Provoking Read
As a law student, I found David Hackett Souter's insights on the Rehnquist Court to be incredibly enlightening. The way he breaks down complex legal thoughts in a traditional Republican context really made the material accessible. I enjoyed it so much, I’m gifting it to my professor!
C
Carlos Mendez
A Thought-Provoking Read
As a law student, I found David Hackett Souter's insights on the Rehnquist Court to be incredibly enlightening. The way he breaks down complex legal thoughts in a traditional Republican context really made the material accessible. I enjoyed it so much, I’m gifting it to my professor!
For MAP (Minimum Advertised Price) violations and Intellectual Property (IP) or Trademark concerns, please contact:
support@ergodebooks.com
⚠️ California Proposition 65 Warning: Some products sold on this website may expose you to chemicals known to the State of California to cause cancer, birth defects, or other reproductive harm. For more information, visit www.P65Warnings.ca.gov.
