Decentralization in U.S. Public Higher Education Case Studies: New Jersey, Illinois, and Arkansas,Used

Decentralization in U.S. Public Higher Education Case Studies: New Jersey, Illinois, and Arkansas,Used

In Stock
SKU: DADAX3838321308
Brand: LAP Lambert Academic Publishing
Sale price$151.90 Regular price$217.00
Save $65.10
Quantity
Add to wishlist
Add to compare

Processing time: 1-3 days

US Orders Ships in: 3-5 days

International Orders Ships in: 8-12 days

Return Policy: 15-days return on defective items

Payment Option
Payment Methods

Help

If you have any questions, you are always welcome to contact us. We'll get back to you as soon as possible, withing 24 hours on weekdays.

Customer service

All questions about your order, return and delivery must be sent to our customer service team by e-mail at yourstore@yourdomain.com

Sale & Press

If you are interested in selling our products, need more information about our brand or wish to make a collaboration, please contact us at press@yourdomain.com

This study looks at three states, New Jersey, Illinois, and Arkansas, to answer the questions whether it is centralization or decentralization that promotes greater efficiency, achieves outcomes, proves more effective, and offers greater accountability. The study explores, in depth, the historical relationships between state government and public higher education institutions the three states where government control and authority were lessened in the mid1990s and details the shift to decentralization. The purpose:of the study was to explore the policy shift to decentralization and the effects it had on public higher education. Eighteen generalizations were drawn regarding the policy shift, while twelve generalizations were drawn regarding the effects of decentralization. Twelve policy recommendations are offered as guides for decentralizing state policy action. Two grounded theories were developed:(1) a destabilized state higher education system, an ideological policy entrepreneur, and opportunity produce a policy shift and (2) the main effect of the shift is to restore greater equilibrium between public institutions and the state.

⚠️ WARNING (California Proposition 65):

This product may contain chemicals known to the State of California to cause cancer, birth defects, or other reproductive harm.

For more information, please visit www.P65Warnings.ca.gov.

Recently Viewed