Title
Economic Value Added(EVA) Myths and Realities: Evidences from Indian Banking Industry,Used
Sold by Ergodebooks, an authorized reseller.
Returns accepted within 30 days | support@ergodebooks.com
Shipping Information
- Free Standard Shipping — United States only
- Processing Time: 1–3 business days
- Estimated Delivery: 3–5 business days after dispatch
- Double-boxed, fully insured & discreetly packaged
- Tracking number sent via email once dispatched
- Orders over $250 require signature upon delivery. Taxes calculated at checkout.
Returns & Refund
Returns accepted within 30 days of delivery.
Damaged or Defective Item
Free return shipping + replacement or full refund
Wrong Item Received
Free return shipping + replacement or full refund
Change of Mind
Return shipping at customer's expense · 25% restocking fee applies
Payment Option
The literature regarding EVA has given assorted view, as stated by Lehen and Makhija (1997), EVA is seen by its proponents as providing the most reliable yeartoyear indicator of a marketbased performance measure known as Market Value Added Despite wide interest in EVA, little is known empirically about the efficacy of this measure versus other measures of performance The evidence from these studies is mixed, however, and has not be resolved the debate over performance measures. While accounting based performance measures such as net profit (PAT), earnings per share (EPS), return on equity (ROE), return on assets (ROA) and return on investment (ROIC) are among the most commonly used performance measures, they are often criticized for not taking into consideration the total cost of capital and for being unduly influenced by accrualbased accounting conventions. Stewart (1991) also support that such traditional measures as earning per share (EPS), return on equity (ROE), and return on investment (ROI) are misleading measures of corporate performance. But the empirical evidences about superiority of EVA over traditional matrices are mixed.
⚠️ WARNING (California Proposition 65):
This product may contain chemicals known to the State of California to cause cancer, birth defects, or other reproductive harm.
For more information, please visit www.P65Warnings.ca.gov.