Electricity Deregulation and Vertical Integration: Electricity Deregulation, Vertical Integration and the Importance of Independ,Used

Electricity Deregulation and Vertical Integration: Electricity Deregulation, Vertical Integration and the Importance of Independ,Used

In Stock
SKU: DADAX383836550X
Brand: LAP Lambert Academic Publishing
Sale price$121.52 Regular price$173.60
Save $52.08
Quantity
Add to wishlist
Add to compare

Processing time: 1-3 days

US Orders Ships in: 3-5 days

International Orders Ships in: 8-12 days

Return Policy: 15-days return on defective items

Payment Option
Payment Methods

Help

If you have any questions, you are always welcome to contact us. We'll get back to you as soon as possible, withing 24 hours on weekdays.

Customer service

All questions about your order, return and delivery must be sent to our customer service team by e-mail at yourstore@yourdomain.com

Sale & Press

If you are interested in selling our products, need more information about our brand or wish to make a collaboration, please contact us at press@yourdomain.com

This work examines the progression of generators and retailers, following electricity deregulation, to vertically integrate (VI) to determine whether all participants might benefit, or because generators are provided with increased market power, electricity consumers in particular could be worse off. The drivers of generators and retailers to vertically integrate are examined, with the lessons learnt applied to the Queensland electricity market. A literature review was first undertaken, with particular reference to the writings of Oliver Williamson. The Queensland analysis concluded that the maximum benefits that consumers could expect from VI was $138 million p.a. with current meter technology and strong retail competition, increasing to $156 million p.a. if meter technology improved. Total possible VI benefits were estimated at $321 million p.a., so consumers could expect to receive no more than 50% of total VI benefits. That is in a strongly competitive retail market, consumers could expect to receive, at the most, 50% of VI benefits, whereas in a weakly competitive retail market, consumers could be worse off.

⚠️ WARNING (California Proposition 65):

This product may contain chemicals known to the State of California to cause cancer, birth defects, or other reproductive harm.

For more information, please visit www.P65Warnings.ca.gov.

Recently Viewed