Title
Emissions of CO2 fissioned, flushed, gone with the wind?: Comparative study of costeffectiveness of different electrical capa,Used
Sold by Ergodebooks, an authorized reseller.
Returns accepted within 30 days | support@ergodebooks.com
Shipping Information
- Free Standard Shipping — United States only
- Processing Time: 1–3 business days
- Estimated Delivery: 3–5 business days after dispatch
- Double-boxed, fully insured & discreetly packaged
- Tracking number sent via email once dispatched
- Orders over $250 require signature upon delivery. Taxes calculated at checkout.
Returns & Refund
Returns accepted within 30 days of delivery.
Damaged or Defective Item
Free return shipping + replacement or full refund
Wrong Item Received
Free return shipping + replacement or full refund
Change of Mind
Return shipping at customer's expense · 25% restocking fee applies
Payment Option
This paper focuses on calculating the most economically efficient ways of limiting CO2 emissions using technologies available in Europe. The emission scenarios incorporate nuclear power plants and mixes of coal power plants with onshore wind farms, offshore wind farms and hydroelectric power plants, all equal in terms of CO2 emission reduction within the set time horizon, with technology differences and natural resources accounting for different final calculated costs of electrical energy production. With little to no chances of Poland adapting both an ambitious renewable scheme and a nuclear scheme, a renewable/coal mix should be chosen, due to its higher economic efficiency. For questions, different time horizons, studies incorporating forestation (actually more profitable than carbon credits) or Life Cycle Assessments, please contact me at jhwisniewski@gmail.com
⚠️ WARNING (California Proposition 65):
This product may contain chemicals known to the State of California to cause cancer, birth defects, or other reproductive harm.
For more information, please visit www.P65Warnings.ca.gov.