Hidden Hitchcock,Used

Product DescriptionNo filmmaker has more successfully courted massaudience understanding than Alfred Hitchcock, and none has been studied more intensively by scholars. In Hidden Hitchcock, D. A. Miller does what seems impossible: he discovers what has remained unseen in Hitchcocks movies, a secret style that imbues his films with a radical duplicity.Focusing on three filmsStrangers on a Train, Rope, and The Wrong ManMiller shows how Hitchcock anticipates, even demands a TooClose Viewer. Dwelling within us all and vigilant even when everything appears to be in good order, this TooClose Viewer attempts to see more than the director points out, to expand the space of the film and the duration of the viewing experience. And, thanks to Hidden Hitchcock, that obsessive attention is rewarded. In Hitchcocks visual puns, his socalled continuity errors, and his hidden appearances (not to be confused with his cameos), Miller finds wellsprings of enigma.Hidden Hitchcock is a revelatory work that not only shows how little we know this best known of filmmakers, but also how near such tooclose viewing comes to cinephilic madness.ReviewThe drama of Hidden Hitchcock is an amour fou between its subject and its author, the hypervigilant viewer whom Hitchcock baits with meaningless discrepancies and rankling imperfections. Studying those imperfections can be deranging, and one way to read Millers book is as an essay on the obsessive, socially isolating behavior moviegoing involves. Max Nelson, CineasteMiller offers . . . a way to rethink the ways we watch and engage with all films, not just the Hitchcockian ones. Popmatters'Millers enjoyable, vivacious romp through viewing and reviewing the cinema of Hitchcock pioneers a compelling new approach to viewership and carves out new scholarly territory. This is a major contribution to the literature on Hitchcock and film studies more broadly. Essential.' Choice'For D. A. Miller, in his . . . excellent new book, Hidden Hitchcock, the master's films dont only teach us, they tease us. Not a bullying kind of teasing so much as a strip kind of teasing, which is to say, they show us everything, just not that. A big part of Hidden Hitchcock's considerable pleasure lies in trying to figure just what that is. Miller takes us on an almost Herzogian (Werner, with a bit of Moses mixed in) quest to uncover a hidden drama playing out in the background of Hitchcocks films. . . . Ultimately, Miller's book is a powerful polemic in favor of an oldschool, deeply imaginative, defiantly subjective mode of interpretation that we might associate with Susan Sontag at her best, or Roland Barthes pretty much all the time. And it returns us to the problem of the unconscious in an era when theorists keep trying to wish it away.' Ben Kafka, ArtforumTthe incredibly close formalist reading on display in Hidden Hitchcock should not be taken as a turning away from Millers more obviously political work on discipline and surveillance (in a Foucauldian sense), or on queerness, the closet, and textual pleasure. Rather it marks a continuation of a longrunning concern, namely, how the person, willingly or defiantly or ambivalently, is incarnated in narrative form, not by the smooth running of hermeneutic codes, nor by repressive enclosure, but by the very breakdowns, lapses, and stutterings of style.' Film QuarterlyClever and elegant, this super closeup look at just a few moments in Strangers on a Train, Rope, and The Wrong Man goes to the heart of what it means to view and read any filmand by extension, any work of representational art. Because it brings the issue of interpretation back to the table, I would recommend Hidden Hitchcock to everyone who cares about the value and power of movies. Dudley Andrew, Yale University'Millers tooclose readings asks those who follow to surrender the pleasures it derails for the much more tendentious, even obsessivecompulsive, ple