Image Retrieval: A Comparative Analysis of Leading Search Engines: Analysis of Five Search Engines,Used

Image Retrieval: A Comparative Analysis of Leading Search Engines: Analysis of Five Search Engines,Used

In Stock
SKU: DADAX3659228362
Brand: LAP Lambert Academic Publishing
Condition: New
Regular price$111.39
Quantity
Add to wishlist
Add to compare
Sold by Ergodebooks, an authorized reseller.

Processing time: 1-3 days

US Orders Ships in: 3-5 days

International Orders Ships in: 8-12 days

Return Policy: 15-days return on defective items

Payment Option
Payment Methods

Help

If you have any questions, you are always welcome to contact us. We'll get back to you as soon as possible, withing 24 hours on weekdays.

Customer service

All questions about your order, return and delivery must be sent to our customer service team by e-mail at yourstore@yourdomain.com

Sale & Press

If you are interested in selling our products, need more information about our brand or wish to make a collaboration, please contact us at press@yourdomain.com

The World Wide Web has grown amazingly in the last two decades. Abundant information is available on the web and people regularly search the web to gather relevant information. Search engines play an important role in making users search the contents online using textual queries and other features to suite their requirements. Search engines now provide various added services too. This work presents critical evaluation of five popular search engines i.e. Google, Yahoo, AltaVista, Ask and Bing based on added features along with enduser experiences recorded during a survey. Images of thirty ambiguous words are retrieved from these search engines and analyzed and compared on the basis of their features, behaviour, functionalities, time taken, number of results and their versatility. The outcome of this study indicates the search engine(s) that provide good image results for ambiguous queries and the ones that provide the most features. We also put these search engines to various statistical comparisons including statistical tests to prove the hypothesis considered for this study. The results are elaborated using graphical interpretations.

⚠️ WARNING (California Proposition 65):

This product may contain chemicals known to the State of California to cause cancer, birth defects, or other reproductive harm.

For more information, please visit www.P65Warnings.ca.gov.

Recently Viewed