Title
Logical Tools For Modelling Legal Argument: A Study Of Defeasible Reasoning In Law (Law And Philosophy Library, 32),New
Sold by Ergodebooks, an authorized reseller.
Returns accepted within 30 days | support@ergodebooks.com
Shipping Information
- Free Standard Shipping — United States only
- Processing Time: 1–3 business days
- Estimated Delivery: 3–5 business days after dispatch
- Double-boxed, fully insured & discreetly packaged
- Tracking number sent via email once dispatched
- Orders over $250 require signature upon delivery. Taxes calculated at checkout.
Returns & Refund
Returns accepted within 30 days of delivery.
Damaged or Defective Item
Free return shipping + replacement or full refund
Wrong Item Received
Free return shipping + replacement or full refund
Change of Mind
Return shipping at customer's expense · 25% restocking fee applies
Payment Option
This Book Is A Revised And Extended Version Of My Phd Thesis 'Logical Tools For Modelling Legal Argument', Which I Defended On 14 January 1993 At The Free University Amsterdam. The First Five Chapters Of The Thesis Have Remained Almost Completely Unchanged But The Other Chapters Have Undergone Considerable Revision And Expansion. Most Importantly, I Have Replaced The Formal Argumentbased System Of The Old Chapters 6, 7 And 8 With A Revised And Extended System, Whieh I Have Developed During The Last Three Years In Collaboration With Giovanni Sartor. Apart From Some Technical Improvements, The Main Additions To The Old System Are The Enriehment Of Its Language With A Nonprovability Operator, And The Ability To Formalise Reasoning About Preference Criteria. Moreover, The New System Has A Very Intuitive Dialectieal Form, As Opposed To The Rather Unintuitive Fixedpoint Appearance Of The Old System. Another Important Revision Is The Split Of The Old Chapter 9 Into Two New Chapters. The Oldsection 9. 1 On Related Research Has Been Updated And Expanded Into A Whole Chapter, While The Rest Of The Old Chapter Is Now In Revised Form In Chapter 10. This Chapter Also Contains Two New Contributions, A Detailed Discussion Of Gordon'S Pleadings Game, And A General Description Of A Multiiayered Overall View On The Structure Of Argu Mentation, Comprising A Logieal, Dialectical, Procedural And Strategie Layer. Finally, In The Revised Conclusion I Have Paid More Attention To The Relevance Of My Investigations For Legal Philosophy And Argumentation Theory.
⚠️ WARNING (California Proposition 65):
This product may contain chemicals known to the State of California to cause cancer, birth defects, or other reproductive harm.
For more information, please visit www.P65Warnings.ca.gov.