Methodology of Evaluation of Crossborder Impacts and Cooperation: Methodology of Checking and Projects Evaluation of Crossbord,Used

Methodology of Evaluation of Crossborder Impacts and Cooperation: Methodology of Checking and Projects Evaluation of Crossbord,Used

In Stock
SKU: DADAX3845413778
Brand: LAP Lambert Academic Publishing
Condition: New
$89.87
Quantity
Add to wishlist
Add to compare
Sold by Ergodebooks, an authorized reseller.

Processing time: 1-3 days

US Orders Ships in: 3-5 days

International Orders Ships in: 8-12 days

Return Policy: 15-days return on defective items

Payment Option
Payment Methods

Help

If you have any questions, you are always welcome to contact us. We'll get back to you as soon as possible, withing 24 hours on weekdays.

Customer service

All questions about your order, return and delivery must be sent to our customer service team by e-mail at yourstore@yourdomain.com

Sale & Press

If you are interested in selling our products, need more information about our brand or wish to make a collaboration, please contact us at press@yourdomain.com

Main goal of this work is to present history of development of the European crossborder cooperation (CBC), in the context of crossborder impacts (and their evaluation), as added value of the projects realized within the European territorial cooperation. It is one of the tools in unification and integration of Europe. This goal was reached due to examining outputs of questionnaires and careful analysis of programme documents. The output of this work is a compilation of problematic fields, which were present during evaluation of crossborder impacts and cooperation within realized projects. Main problem seems to be the wide range of activities realized within individual programmes, and therefore it is very complicated to compile a single, complete system of evaluation and checking of projects. It arises from the analysis of programme documents as in OP CBC CZPL and OP CBC SKCZ, that the ability of mixing soft and hard activities within one operational programme and within one area of support causes need of as most universal framework for evaluations as possible. That on contrary excludes the option of including all possible situations incurred during the evaluations.

⚠️ WARNING (California Proposition 65):

This product may contain chemicals known to the State of California to cause cancer, birth defects, or other reproductive harm.

For more information, please visit www.P65Warnings.ca.gov.

Recently Viewed