Nonproliferation Norms: Why States Choose Nuclear Restraint (Studies In Security And International Affairs Ser.),Used
Nonproliferation Norms: Why States Choose Nuclear Restraint (Studies In Security And International Affairs Ser.),Used
Nonproliferation Norms: Why States Choose Nuclear Restraint (Studies In Security And International Affairs Ser.),Used

Nonproliferation Norms: Why States Choose Nuclear Restraint (Studies In Security And International Affairs Ser.),Used

In Stock
SKU: SONG0820332356
Brand: University Of Georgia Press
$10.59 $15.13
Save $4.54
Quantity
Add to wishlist
Add to compare

Processing time: 1-3 days

US Orders Ships in: 3-5 days

International Orders Ships in: 8-12 days

Return Policy: 15-days return on defective items

Payment Option
Payment Methods

Help

If you have any questions, you are always welcome to contact us. We'll get back to you as soon as possible, withing 24 hours on weekdays.

Customer service

All questions about your order, return and delivery must be sent to our customer service team by e-mail at yourstore@yourdomain.com

Sale & Press

If you are interested in selling our products, need more information about our brand or wish to make a collaboration, please contact us at press@yourdomain.com

Too Often, Our Focus On The Relative Handful Of Countries With Nuclear Weapons Keeps Us From Asking An Important Question: Why Do So Many More States Not Have Such Weapons? More Important, What Can We Learn From These Examples Of Nuclear Restraint? Maria Rost Rublee Argues That In Addition To Understanding A State'S Security Environment, We Must Appreciate The Social Forces That Influence How States Conceptualize The Value Of Nuclear Weapons. Much Of What Rublee Says Also Applies To Other Weapons Of Mass Destruction, As Well As National Security Decision Making In General.The Nuclear Nonproliferation Movement Has Created An International Social Environment That Exerts A Variety Of Normative Pressures On How State Elites And Policymakers Think About Nuclear Weapons. Within A Social Psychology Framework, Rublee Examines Decision Making About Nuclear Weapons In Five Case Studies: Japan, Egypt, Libya, Sweden, And Germany.In Each Case, Rublee Considers The Extent To Which Nuclear Forbearance Resulted From Persuasion (Genuine Transformation Of Preferences), Social Conformity (The Desire To Maximize Social Benefits And/Or Minimize Social Costs, Without A Change In Underlying Preferences), Or Identification (The Desire Or Habit Of Following The Actions Of An Important Other).The Book Offers Bold Policy Prescriptions Based On A Sharpened Knowledge Of The Many Ways We Transmit And Process Nonproliferation Norms. The Social Mechanisms That Encourage Nonproliferationand The Regime That Created Themmust Be Preserved And Strengthened, Rublee Argues, For Without Them States That Have Exercised Nuclear Restraint May Rethink Their Choices.

⚠️ WARNING (California Proposition 65):

This product may contain chemicals known to the State of California to cause cancer, birth defects, or other reproductive harm.

For more information, please visit www.P65Warnings.ca.gov.

Recently Viewed