Title
Perceptions of a Polarized Court: How Division among Justices Shapes the Supreme Court's Public Image,Used
Sold by Ergodebooks, an authorized reseller.
Returns accepted within 30 days | support@ergodebooks.com
Shipping Information
- Free Standard Shipping — United States only
- Processing Time: 3–5 business days
- Estimated Delivery: 6–10 business days after dispatch
- Double-boxed, fully insured & discreetly packaged
- Tracking number sent via email once dispatched
Returns & Refund
Returns accepted within 30 days of delivery.
Damaged or Defective Item
Free return shipping + replacement or full refund
Wrong Item Received
Free return shipping + replacement or full refund
Change of Mind
Return shipping at customer's expense · 25% restocking fee applies
Like our divided nation, the Supreme Court is polarized. But does a split among Supreme Court justicesparticularly when it occurs along ideological lineshurt public perception and the Courts ability to muster popular support for its rulings? Michael Salamones Perceptions of a Polarized Court offers the first comprehensive, empirical analysis of how divisiveness affects the legitimacy of the Courts decisions.Salamone looks specifically at the Roberts Court yearswhich are characterized by unprecedented ideological and partisan polarization among the justicesto evaluate the public consequences of divided Supreme Court rulings. He also analyzes both the medias treatment of Supreme Court decisions and public opinion toward the Courts rulings to show how public acceptance is (or is not) affected.Salmone contends that judicial polarization has had an impact on the manner in which journalists report on the Supreme Court. However, contrary to expectation, Court dissent may help secure public support by tapping into core democratic values.
⚠️ WARNING (California Proposition 65):
This product may contain chemicals known to the State of California to cause cancer, birth defects, or other reproductive harm.
For more information, please visit www.P65Warnings.ca.gov.