Poverty Reduction in Brazil: A case study of whether growth has been pro poor,Used

Poverty Reduction in Brazil: A case study of whether growth has been pro poor,Used

In Stock
SKU: DADAX3838315057
Brand: LAP Lambert Academic Publishing
Sale price$74.68 Regular price$106.69
Save $32.01
Quantity
Add to wishlist
Add to compare

Processing time: 1-3 days

US Orders Ships in: 3-5 days

International Orders Ships in: 8-12 days

Return Policy: 15-days return on defective items

Payment Option
Payment Methods

Help

If you have any questions, you are always welcome to contact us. We'll get back to you as soon as possible, withing 24 hours on weekdays.

Customer service

All questions about your order, return and delivery must be sent to our customer service team by e-mail at yourstore@yourdomain.com

Sale & Press

If you are interested in selling our products, need more information about our brand or wish to make a collaboration, please contact us at press@yourdomain.com

This paper will focus on how growth has been allocated among the people in Brazil, during the years of 1976 and 2003. Poverty and inequalities are investigated along with poverty reduction, thus if growth has been pro poor. In addition, the regional differences the southeast and the northeast are analyzed separately in order to see if there is any difference in the two regions in the agricultural and the industrial sector respectively. This is done to see if there is any correlation between growth and poverty reduction. Using to the theory by Arthur Lewis who developed a two sector model the agricultural and industrial the Lewis organizational dualism. This model was later modified by Gunnar Myrdal and Nicholas Kaldor, who blamed the current situation of the society on historical accident where, because of an upward spiral of cumulative causation, urban areas grew and regions in the periphery stagnated. Data collected from Instituto de Pesquisa Econmica Aplicada between the periods 1976 2003 was used and showed that the income in the poorest part of the population seemed to grow at a much slower past than of the rich.

⚠️ WARNING (California Proposition 65):

This product may contain chemicals known to the State of California to cause cancer, birth defects, or other reproductive harm.

For more information, please visit www.P65Warnings.ca.gov.

Recently Viewed