Reasons for and against giving money to charities: Comparative study of donors and nondonors behaviour on the French and UK mar,Used

Reasons for and against giving money to charities: Comparative study of donors and nondonors behaviour on the French and UK mar,Used

In Stock
SKU: DADAX3846543446
Brand: LAP Lambert Academic Publishing
$84.81 $121.16
Save $36.35
Quantity
Add to wishlist
Add to compare

Processing time: 1-3 days

US Orders Ships in: 3-5 days

International Orders Ships in: 8-12 days

Return Policy: 15-days return on defective items

Payment Option
Payment Methods

Help

If you have any questions, you are always welcome to contact us. We'll get back to you as soon as possible, withing 24 hours on weekdays.

Customer service

All questions about your order, return and delivery must be sent to our customer service team by e-mail at yourstore@yourdomain.com

Sale & Press

If you are interested in selling our products, need more information about our brand or wish to make a collaboration, please contact us at press@yourdomain.com

Charitable giving and donors' behaviour has received extensive attention in past research while the case of nondonors has been highly neglected. As charities need more and more funds to sustain their actions toward the cause they are supporting, they need to find as much resources as they can. However, the charitable market is saturated and faces fierce competition (Eveland and Crutchield, 2007). Besides, with the recent recession, the amount of the donors' contributions tends to decrease. It is suggested that there is an opportunity to broaden the market by extending the study of charitable behaviour to nondonors. Based on Westaby's statement (2005a) that reasons are better predictor of behaviour than attitudes, this paper presents the results of a study that examined the reasons for and against giving money to charities within the context of two European countries, the UK and France. It investigated whether the two populations' behaviours differ or common marketing tactics could eventually be developped. Eleven qualitative interviews were caried out in each country with donors and nondonors.

⚠️ WARNING (California Proposition 65):

This product may contain chemicals known to the State of California to cause cancer, birth defects, or other reproductive harm.

For more information, please visit www.P65Warnings.ca.gov.

Recently Viewed