Title
Reconstructing American Legal Realism & Rethinking Private Law Theory,Used
Processing time: 1-3 days
US Orders Ships in: 3-5 days
International Orders Ships in: 8-12 days
Return Policy: 15-days return on defective items
Payment Option
In the myriad choices of interpretation judges face when confronted with rules and cases, legal realists are concerned with how these doctrinal materials carry over into judicial outcomes. What can explain past judicial behavior and predict its future course? How can law constrain judgments made by unelected judges? How can the distinction between law and politics be maintained despite the collapse of law's autonomy in its positivist rendition?In Reconstructing American Legal Realism & Rethinking Private Law Theory, Hanoch Dagan provides an innovative and useful interpretation of legal realism. He revives the legal realists' rich account of law as a growing institution accommodating three sets of constitutive tensionspower and reason, science and craft, and tradition and progressand demonstrates how the major claims attributed to legal realism fit into this conception of law.Dagan seeks to rein in realist descendants who have become fixated on one aspect of the big picture, and to dispel the misconceptions that those gone astray represent the tradition accurately or that realism is now merely a historical signpost. He draws upon the realist texts of Oliver Wendell Holmes, Karl Llewellyn, and others to explain how legal realism offers important and unique jurisprudential insights that are not just a part of legal history, but are also relevant and useful for a contemporary understanding of legal theory.Building on this realist conception of law and enriching its texture, Dagan addresses more particular jurisprudential questions. He shows that the realist achievement in capturing law's irreducible complexity is crucial to the reinvigoration of legal theory as a distinct scholarly subject matter, and is also inspiring for a host of other, more specific theoretical topics, such as the rule of law, the autonomy and taxonomy of private law, the relationships between rights and remedies, and the pluralism and perfectionism that typify private law.
⚠️ WARNING (California Proposition 65):
This product may contain chemicals known to the State of California to cause cancer, birth defects, or other reproductive harm.
For more information, please visit www.P65Warnings.ca.gov.
- Q: What is the main focus of 'Reconstructing American Legal Realism & Rethinking Private Law Theory'? A: The book primarily explores the interpretation of legal realism, examining how doctrinal materials influence judicial outcomes and how law can constrain judicial judgments.
- Q: Who is the author of this book? A: The author is Hanoch Dagan, a legal scholar who provides insights into legal realism and its relevance to contemporary legal theory.
- Q: What are the key themes discussed in the book? A: Key themes include the tensions between power and reason, science and craft, tradition and progress in law, and the unique jurisprudential insights offered by legal realism.
- Q: Is this book suitable for beginners in legal theory? A: While the book offers valuable insights, it may be more suitable for readers with some background in legal theory or philosophy due to its complex discussions.
- Q: How many pages does the book have? A: The book contains 256 pages.
- Q: When was 'Reconstructing American Legal Realism & Rethinking Private Law Theory' published? A: The book was published on September 19, 2013.
- Q: What type of binding does this book have? A: This book is available in hardcover binding.
- Q: What category does this book fall under? A: The book is categorized under Administrative Law.
- Q: Does this book address contemporary legal issues? A: Yes, it discusses how the principles of legal realism are applicable to modern legal theory and various jurisprudential topics.
- Q: Can this book help in understanding the relationship between law and politics? A: Yes, it explores how the distinction between law and politics can be maintained despite challenges to law's autonomy.