If you have any questions, you are always welcome to contact us. We'll get back to you as soon as possible, withing 24 hours on weekdays.
Customer service
All questions about your order, return and delivery must be sent to our customer service team by e-mail at yourstore@yourdomain.com
Sale & Press
If you are interested in selling our products, need more information about our brand or wish to make a collaboration, please contact us at press@yourdomain.com
Help
If you have any questions, you are always welcome to contact us. We'll get back to you as soon as possible, withing 24 hours on weekdays.
Customer service
All questions about your order, return and delivery must be sent to our customer service team by e-mail at yourstore@yourdomain.com
Sale & Press
If you are interested in selling our products, need more information about our brand or wish to make a collaboration, please contact us at press@yourdomain.com
Franklin Roosevelt'S Intentions During The Three Years Between Munich And Pearl Harbor Have Been A Source Of Controversy Among Historians For Decades. Barbara Farnham Offers Both A Theory Of How The Domestic Political Context Affects Foreign Policy Decisions In General And A Fresh Interpretation Of Fdr'S Postmunich Policies Based On The Insights That The Theory Provides. Between 1936 And 1938, Roosevelt Searched For Ways To Influence The Deteriorating International Situation. When Hitler'S Behavior During The Munich Crisis Showed Him To Be Incorrigibly Aggressive, Fdr Settled On Aiding The Democracies, A Course To Which He Adhered Until America'S Entry Into The War. This Policy Attracted Him Because It Allowed Him To Deal With A Serious Problem: The Conflict Between The Need To Stop Hitler And The Domestic Imperative To Avoid Any Risk Of American Involvement In A War.Because Existing Theoretical Approaches To Value Conflict Ignore The Influence Of Political Factors On Decisionmaking, They Offer Little Help In Explaining Roosevelt'S Behavior. As An Alternative, This Book Develops A Political Approach To Decisionmaking Which Focuses On The Impact That Awareness Of The Imperatives Of The Political Context Can Have On Decisionmaking Processes And, Through Them, Policy Outcomes. It Suggests That In The Face Of A Clash Of Central Values Decisionmakers Who Are Aware Of The Demands Of The Political Context Are Likely To Be Reluctant To Make Tradeoffs, Seeking Instead A Solution That Gives Some Measure Of Satisfaction To All The Values Implicated In The Decision.
⚠️ WARNING (California Proposition 65):
This product may contain chemicals known to the State of California to cause cancer,
birth defects, or other reproductive harm.
For MAP (Minimum Advertised Price) violations and Intellectual Property (IP) or Trademark concerns, please contact:
support@ergodebooks.com
⚠️ California Proposition 65 Warning: Some products sold on this website may expose you to chemicals known to the State of California to cause cancer, birth defects, or other reproductive harm. For more information, visit www.P65Warnings.ca.gov.
