Solomonic Judgements: Studies in the Limitation of Rationality,New

Solomonic Judgements: Studies in the Limitation of Rationality,New

In Stock
SKU: DADAX0521376084
UPC: 9780521376082
Brand: Cambridge University Press
Condition: New
Regular price$74.22
Quantity
Add to wishlist
Add to compare

Sold by Ergodebooks, an authorized reseller.

Returns accepted within 30 days | support@ergodebooks.com

Verified
Shipping Information
  • Free Standard Shipping — United States only
  • Processing Time: 1–3 business days
  • Estimated Delivery: 3–5 business days after dispatch
  • Double-boxed, fully insured & discreetly packaged
  • Tracking number sent via email once dispatched
  • Orders over $250 require signature upon delivery. Taxes calculated at checkout.
Returns & Refund

Returns accepted within 30 days of delivery.

Damaged or Defective Item

Free return shipping + replacement or full refund

Wrong Item Received

Free return shipping + replacement or full refund

Change of Mind

Return shipping at customer's expense · 25% restocking fee applies

All returns require a Return Authorization (RA) number before sending.

To initiate a return, contact us:

support@ergodebooks.com +1 (281) 738-1050
View Full Return & Refund Policy
Payment Option
Payment Methods

Help

If you have any questions, you are always welcome to contact us. We'll get back to you as soon as possible, withing 24 hours on weekdays.

Customer service

All questions about your order, return and delivery must be sent to our customer service team by e-mail at yourstore@yourdomain.com

Sale & Press

If you are interested in selling our products, need more information about our brand or wish to make a collaboration, please contact us at press@yourdomain.com

This volume of essays is very much a sequel to the two earlier collections by Jon Elster, Ulysses and the Sirens and Sour Grapes. His topic is rationalityits scope, its limitations, and its failures. Elster considers rational responses to the insufficiency of reason itself and to the 'indeterminacies' in deploying rational choice theory, and discusses the irrationality of not seeing when, where, and what these are. A key essay that gives the collection its title examines disputes in cases of child custody that are paradigmatically indeterminate. Leaving aside cases where one parent is patently unfit and assuming that protracted dispute is against the immediate interests of the child, Elster argues that three options present themselves: a strong presumption in favor of the mother, a strong presumption in favor of the primary caretaker, and tossing a coin. Though the first two options may be preferable in the short term, Elster argues that there is a case for randomization in the long term.

⚠️ WARNING (California Proposition 65):

This product may contain chemicals known to the State of California to cause cancer, birth defects, or other reproductive harm.

For more information, please visit www.P65Warnings.ca.gov.

Recently Viewed