Title
Stakeholder Collaboration on Ecotourism Development: A comparative case study in panda nature reserves in Sichuan China,Used
Sold by Ergodebooks, an authorized reseller.
Returns accepted within 30 days | support@ergodebooks.com
Shipping Information
- Free Standard Shipping — United States only
- Processing Time: 1–3 business days
- Estimated Delivery: 3–5 business days after dispatch
- Double-boxed, fully insured & discreetly packaged
- Tracking number sent via email once dispatched
- Orders over $250 require signature upon delivery. Taxes calculated at checkout.
Returns & Refund
Returns accepted within 30 days of delivery.
Damaged or Defective Item
Free return shipping + replacement or full refund
Wrong Item Received
Free return shipping + replacement or full refund
Change of Mind
Return shipping at customer's expense · 25% restocking fee applies
Payment Option
Along with nature reserve based tourism development, there has been an increasing recognition of the need for stakeholder collaboration. This qualitative case study explores ecotourism development in two panda reserves located in Southwestern China. It sets out to understand perspectives on collaboration held by stakeholders such as governments, nature reserve administrations, local communities, tourism businesses, and conservation nongovernmental organizations. The stakeholderdescribed collaboration is compared to the literature reporting the ideal situation. The study identifies four categories of factors that were perceived, by the stakeholders, as facilitating and/or constraining collaboration: 1) sociocultural and economic dynamics, 2) resource interdependency, 3) power relationships and organizational dynamics, and 4) initial domain consensus on ecotourism development. The findings imply that stakeholders understanding of collaboration is inconsistent and effective collaborative mechanisms are yet to be developed. Also, stakeholders must recognize the prominent role of the government and focus on capacitybuilding of stakeholder groups.
⚠️ WARNING (California Proposition 65):
This product may contain chemicals known to the State of California to cause cancer, birth defects, or other reproductive harm.
For more information, please visit www.P65Warnings.ca.gov.