Stanton V. Armstrong: Case File (Nita),Used

Stanton V. Armstrong: Case File (Nita),Used

In Stock
SKU: SONG160156581X
Brand: Aspen Publishers
Condition: Used
Regular price$78.28
Quantity
Add to wishlist
Add to compare

Sold by Ergodebooks, an authorized reseller.

Returns accepted within 30 days | support@ergodebooks.com

Verified
Shipping Information
  • Free Standard Shipping — United States only
  • Processing Time: 1–3 business days
  • Estimated Delivery: 3–5 business days after dispatch
  • Double-boxed, fully insured & discreetly packaged
  • Tracking number sent via email once dispatched
  • Orders over $250 require signature upon delivery. Taxes calculated at checkout.
Returns & Refund

Returns accepted within 30 days of delivery.

Damaged or Defective Item

Free return shipping + replacement or full refund

Wrong Item Received

Free return shipping + replacement or full refund

Change of Mind

Return shipping at customer's expense · 25% restocking fee applies

All returns require a Return Authorization (RA) number before sending.

To initiate a return, contact us:

support@ergodebooks.com +1 (281) 738-1050
View Full Return & Refund Policy
Payment Option
Payment Methods

Help

If you have any questions, you are always welcome to contact us. We'll get back to you as soon as possible, withing 24 hours on weekdays.

Customer service

All questions about your order, return and delivery must be sent to our customer service team by e-mail at yourstore@yourdomain.com

Sale & Press

If you are interested in selling our products, need more information about our brand or wish to make a collaboration, please contact us at press@yourdomain.com

Stanton v. Armstrong is a civil action for defamation and tortious interference with contract with the extra glamor of a beauty pageant. Harper Stanton brought the action against Toby Armstrong in the United States District Court, District of Nita, for an allegedly defamatory statement claiming Stanton had taken a bribe to fix the Miss Olympia beauty pageant. Armstrong posted this statement on the Pageant Tips Blog. At the time of the blog post, Stanton was the Chief Executive Officer of Miss Olympia, Inc. and Armstrong was a blogger and the owner of a pageant contestant coaching company. Many facilities and technology malfunctions impacted the quality of the Miss Olympia Pageant that year: lighting and sound problems; a missing judge; changes in the scoring method. After the disastrous pageant, Miss Olympia, Inc. fired Stanton. Were Armstrong's unfounded claims the basis for Stanton's firing? Was Stanton legitimately fired for being a dishonest CEO manipulating the pageant from behind the scenes? Or was Stanton fired for tarnishing the Miss Olympia Pageant through no fault of his own? This entertaining case file supports all the alleged intrigue with exhibits that include blog posts, a Twitter account, and a YouTube video, all hosted on 'microsites' specifically created for use in trial. Scoring sheets and pageant guidelines, photographs, room sketches, and more provide a wealth of information for students to analyze when deciding what to pursue in both depositions and the full trial.

⚠️ WARNING (California Proposition 65):

This product may contain chemicals known to the State of California to cause cancer, birth defects, or other reproductive harm.

For more information, please visit www.P65Warnings.ca.gov.

Recently Viewed