Supreme Hubris: How Overconfidence Is Destroying The Courtand How We Can Fix It,Used

Supreme Hubris: How Overconfidence Is Destroying The Courtand How We Can Fix It,Used

In Stock
SKU: SONG0300264038
Brand: Yale University Press
Regular price$9.17
Quantity
Add to wishlist
Add to compare

Processing time: 1-3 days

US Orders Ships in: 3-5 days

International Orders Ships in: 8-12 days

Return Policy: 15-days return on defective items

Payment Option
Payment Methods

Help

If you have any questions, you are always welcome to contact us. We'll get back to you as soon as possible, withing 24 hours on weekdays.

Customer service

All questions about your order, return and delivery must be sent to our customer service team by e-mail at yourstore@yourdomain.com

Sale & Press

If you are interested in selling our products, need more information about our brand or wish to make a collaboration, please contact us at press@yourdomain.com

How to repair the dysfunction at the Supreme Court in a way that cuts across partisan ideologiesThe Supreme Court, once the most respected institution in American government, is now routinely criticized for rendering decisions based on the individual justices partisan leanings rather than on a faithful reading of the law. For legal scholar Aaron Tang, however, partisanship is not the Courts root problem. Overconfidence is.Conservative and liberal justices alike have adopted a tone of uncompromising certainty in their ability to solve societys problems with just the right lawyerly arguments. The result is a Court that lurches stridently from one case to the next, delegitimizing opposing views and undermining public confidence in itself.To restore the Courts legitimacy, Tang proposes a different approach to hard cases: one in which the Court acknowledges the arguments and interests on both sides and rules in the way that will do the least harm possible. Examining a surprising number of popular opinions where the Court has applied this approachranging from LGBTQ rights to immigration to juvenile justiceTang shows how the least harm principle can provide a promising and legally grounded framework for the difficult cases that divide our nation.

⚠️ WARNING (California Proposition 65):

This product may contain chemicals known to the State of California to cause cancer, birth defects, or other reproductive harm.

For more information, please visit www.P65Warnings.ca.gov.

Recently Viewed