Title
The Evolution of Dominant Logic in Relation to Strategic Inertia: A comparative case study,Used
Sold by Ergodebooks, an authorized reseller.
Returns accepted within 30 days | support@ergodebooks.com
Shipping Information
- Free Standard Shipping — United States only
- Processing Time: 1–3 business days
- Estimated Delivery: 3–5 business days after dispatch
- Double-boxed, fully insured & discreetly packaged
- Tracking number sent via email once dispatched
- Orders over $250 require signature upon delivery. Taxes calculated at checkout.
Returns & Refund
Returns accepted within 30 days of delivery.
Damaged or Defective Item
Free return shipping + replacement or full refund
Wrong Item Received
Free return shipping + replacement or full refund
Change of Mind
Return shipping at customer's expense · 25% restocking fee applies
Payment Option
Why do managers resist change? While this question has incited a lot of curiosity among researchers in the field of strategic management, it remains inconclusive. Therefore, I analyze the evolution of mental models or dominant logic' in order to reveal insights about the difference in the constitution of mental models. Based on the original definition of dominant logic' as "knowledge structure (of a firm's business strategy)" (Prahalad and Bettis, 1986), a knowledgebased view of the firm (Nonaka, 1994; Grant, 1996; Spender, 1996; Von Krogh and Grand, 2000) is adopted. In addition, this research relies on insights from cognitive social psychology (e.g. Ginsberg, 1990) and evolutionary theory (Nelson and Winter, 1982, Dosi and Nelson, 1994) in order to elicit patterns in the evolution of managers' mental models in six software ventures, divided into 3 age groups according to a central hypothesis on strategic inertia in three age categories.
⚠️ WARNING (California Proposition 65):
This product may contain chemicals known to the State of California to cause cancer, birth defects, or other reproductive harm.
For more information, please visit www.P65Warnings.ca.gov.