The Fraud Triangle: A Comparative Analysis of Research Misconduct: Michigan Universities' Faculty Opinion on Research Misconduct,Used

The Fraud Triangle: A Comparative Analysis of Research Misconduct: Michigan Universities' Faculty Opinion on Research Misconduct,Used

In Stock
SKU: DADAX3847314238
Brand: LAP Lambert Academic Publishing
Condition: New
Regular price$94.22
Quantity
Add to wishlist
Add to compare

Sold by Ergodebooks, an authorized reseller.

Returns accepted within 30 days | support@ergodebooks.com

Verified
Shipping Information
  • Free Standard Shipping — United States only
  • Processing Time: 1–3 business days
  • Estimated Delivery: 3–5 business days after dispatch
  • Double-boxed, fully insured & discreetly packaged
  • Tracking number sent via email once dispatched
  • Orders over $250 require signature upon delivery. Taxes calculated at checkout.
Returns & Refund

Returns accepted within 30 days of delivery.

Damaged or Defective Item

Free return shipping + replacement or full refund

Wrong Item Received

Free return shipping + replacement or full refund

Change of Mind

Return shipping at customer's expense · 25% restocking fee applies

All returns require a Return Authorization (RA) number before sending.

To initiate a return, contact us:

support@ergodebooks.com +1 (281) 738-1050
View Full Return & Refund Policy
Payment Option
Payment Methods

Help

If you have any questions, you are always welcome to contact us. We'll get back to you as soon as possible, withing 24 hours on weekdays.

Customer service

All questions about your order, return and delivery must be sent to our customer service team by e-mail at yourstore@yourdomain.com

Sale & Press

If you are interested in selling our products, need more information about our brand or wish to make a collaboration, please contact us at press@yourdomain.com

In the current study, opinions of faculty from Michigans baccalaureate degreegranting universities on the ethicality of research behaviors were examined. In the quantitative method and descriptive survey design, descriptive and comparative statistical tests were used to analyze differences in opinions on plagiarism, falsification, and fabrication based upon the variables of publication workload, levels of funding, and research focus. Hypotheses testing revealed no significant statistical difference in opinions on plagiarism and fabrication, but differences did exist for falsification. A significant statistical difference for falsification occurred based upon funding levels. Leadership, especially from highly funded institutions, need to examine why this difference exists. Future qualitative research and future quantitative research with a narrower focus, broader sampling, and modified survey are recommended.

⚠️ WARNING (California Proposition 65):

This product may contain chemicals known to the State of California to cause cancer, birth defects, or other reproductive harm.

For more information, please visit www.P65Warnings.ca.gov.

Recently Viewed