If you have any questions, you are always welcome to contact us. We'll get back to you as soon as possible, withing 24 hours on weekdays.
Customer service
All questions about your order, return and delivery must be sent to our customer service team by e-mail at yourstore@yourdomain.com
Sale & Press
If you are interested in selling our products, need more information about our brand or wish to make a collaboration, please contact us at press@yourdomain.com
Help
If you have any questions, you are always welcome to contact us. We'll get back to you as soon as possible, withing 24 hours on weekdays.
Customer service
All questions about your order, return and delivery must be sent to our customer service team by e-mail at yourstore@yourdomain.com
Sale & Press
If you are interested in selling our products, need more information about our brand or wish to make a collaboration, please contact us at press@yourdomain.com
The Politics of Precedent on the U.S. Supreme Court offers an insightful and provocative analysis of the Supreme Courts most important taskshaping the law. Thomas Hansford and James Spriggs analyze a key aspect of legal change: the Courts interpretation or treatment of the precedents it has set in the past. Court decisions do not just resolve immediate disputes; they also set broader precedent. The meaning and scope of a precedent, however, can change significantly as the Court revisits it in future cases. The authors contend that these interpretations are driven by an interaction between policy goals and variations in the legal authoritativeness of precedent. From this premise, they build an explanation of the legal interpretation of precedent that yields novel predictions about the nature and timing of legal change.Hansford and Spriggs test their hypotheses by examining how the Court has interpreted the precedents it set between 1946 and 1999. This analysis provides compelling support for their argument, and demonstrates that the justices ideological goals and the role of precedent are inextricably linked. The two prevailing, yet contradictory, views of precedentthat it acts either solely as a constraint, or as a cloak that never actually influences the Courtare incorrect. This book shows that while precedent can operate as a constraint on the justices decisions, it also represents an opportunity to foster preferred societal outcomes.
⚠️ WARNING (California Proposition 65):
This product may contain chemicals known to the State of California to cause cancer,
birth defects, or other reproductive harm.
I really enjoyed The Politics of Precedent! It’s detailed enough for those who study law but also accessible to regular readers like me. The examples they use made it easier to grasp the concepts. I even recommended it to my friends who are in law school, and they loved it too!
S
Samuel Martinez
A Must-Read for Law Enthusiasts
The Politics of Precedent dives deep into how the Supreme Court operates, and it's fascinating. The author does a great job of breaking down complex legal theories. I found the analysis of landmark cases particularly enlightening; it really helped me understand the implications of precedent in our justice system.
F
Fatima Khan
Not What I Expected
This book was a bit of a letdown for me. It didn't live up to the hype, and I found some sections a bit boring. Also, there were some formatting issues that made it hard to follow the arguments. I wanted to love it, but it just didn’t click for me.
N
Nina Patel
Interesting but Very Dense
I bought this book hoping for a straightforward read about the Supreme Court, but it’s quite dense. While the insights are valuable, the writing can be challenging at times. It’s definitely not for casual readers. Still, if you’re into legal theory, it’s worth your time.
For MAP (Minimum Advertised Price) violations and Intellectual Property (IP) or Trademark concerns, please contact:
support@ergodebooks.com
⚠️ California Proposition 65 Warning: Some products sold on this website may expose you to chemicals known to the State of California to cause cancer, birth defects, or other reproductive harm. For more information, visit www.P65Warnings.ca.gov.
