The Scepter of Reason: Public Discussion and Political Radicalism in the Origins of Constitutionalism (Law and Philosophy Librar,Used

The Scepter of Reason: Public Discussion and Political Radicalism in the Origins of Constitutionalism (Law and Philosophy Librar,Used

In Stock
SKU: SONG0792365089
UPC: 9780792365082
Brand: Springer
Condition: Used
Regular price$53.80
Quantity
Add to wishlist
Add to compare

Sold by Ergodebooks, an authorized reseller.

Returns accepted within 30 days | support@ergodebooks.com

Verified
Shipping Information
  • Free Standard Shipping — United States only
  • Processing Time: 1–3 business days
  • Estimated Delivery: 3–5 business days after dispatch
  • Double-boxed, fully insured & discreetly packaged
  • Tracking number sent via email once dispatched
  • Orders over $250 require signature upon delivery. Taxes calculated at checkout.
Returns & Refund

Returns accepted within 30 days of delivery.

Damaged or Defective Item

Free return shipping + replacement or full refund

Wrong Item Received

Free return shipping + replacement or full refund

Change of Mind

Return shipping at customer's expense · 25% restocking fee applies

All returns require a Return Authorization (RA) number before sending.

To initiate a return, contact us:

support@ergodebooks.com +1 (281) 738-1050
View Full Return & Refund Policy
Payment Option
Payment Methods

Help

If you have any questions, you are always welcome to contact us. We'll get back to you as soon as possible, withing 24 hours on weekdays.

Customer service

All questions about your order, return and delivery must be sent to our customer service team by e-mail at yourstore@yourdomain.com

Sale & Press

If you are interested in selling our products, need more information about our brand or wish to make a collaboration, please contact us at press@yourdomain.com

It is not unusual that formal and informal discussions about the political system, its virtues, and its many defects, conclude in a discussion about impartiality. In fact, we all discuss impartiality when we talk about the best way to equally consider all viewpoints. We show our concerns with impartiality when, facing a particular problem, we try to figure out the best solution for all of us, given our conflicting interests. Thus, the quest for impartiality tends to be a common objective for most of us, although we normally disagree on its particular contents. Generally, these formal and informal discussions about impartiality conclude in a dispute between different "epistemic" conceptions. That is to say, simply, that in these situations we begin to disagree about best procedure to defme the more neutral, impartial solution for all of us.! Basically, trying to answer this question we tend to fluctuate between two opposite positions. According to some, the best way to know which is the more impartial solution is to resort to a process of collective reflection: in those situations we have to consider the opinions of all those who are possibly affected.

⚠️ WARNING (California Proposition 65):

This product may contain chemicals known to the State of California to cause cancer, birth defects, or other reproductive harm.

For more information, please visit www.P65Warnings.ca.gov.

Recently Viewed