Title
The Supreme Court And Election Law: Judging Equality From Baker V. Carr To Bush V. Gore,New
Sold by Ergodebooks, an authorized reseller.
Returns accepted within 30 days | support@ergodebooks.com
Shipping Information
- Free Standard Shipping — United States only
- Processing Time: 1–3 business days
- Estimated Delivery: 3–5 business days after dispatch
- Double-boxed, fully insured & discreetly packaged
- Tracking number sent via email once dispatched
- Orders over $250 require signature upon delivery. Taxes calculated at checkout.
Returns & Refund
Returns accepted within 30 days of delivery.
Damaged or Defective Item
Free return shipping + replacement or full refund
Wrong Item Received
Free return shipping + replacement or full refund
Change of Mind
Return shipping at customer's expense · 25% restocking fee applies
Payment Option
In The First Comprehensive Study Of Election Law Since The Supreme Court Decided Bush V. Gore, Richard L. Hasen Rethinks The Courts Role In Regulating Elections. Drawing On The Case Files Of The Warren, Burger, And Rehnquist Courts, Hasen Roots The Courts Intervention In Political Process Cases To The Landmark 1962 Case, Baker V. Carr. The Case Opened The Courts To A Variety Of Election Law Disputes, To The Point That The Courts Now Control And Direct Major Aspects Of The American Electoral Process.The Supreme Court Does Have A Crucial Role To Play In Protecting A Socially Constructed Core Of Political Equality Principles, Contends Hasen, But It Should Leave Contested Questions Of Political Equality To The Political Process Itself. Under This Standard, Many Of The Courts Most Important Election Law Cases From Baker To Bush Have Been Wrongly Decided.
⚠️ WARNING (California Proposition 65):
This product may contain chemicals known to the State of California to cause cancer, birth defects, or other reproductive harm.
For more information, please visit www.P65Warnings.ca.gov.