Title
Which Rights Should Be Universal?
Sold by Ergodebooks, an authorized reseller.
Returns accepted within 30 days | support@ergodebooks.com
Shipping Information
- Free Standard Shipping — United States only
- Processing Time: 1–3 business days
- Estimated Delivery: 3–5 business days after dispatch
- Double-boxed, fully insured & discreetly packaged
- Tracking number sent via email once dispatched
- Orders over $250 require signature upon delivery. Taxes calculated at checkout.
Returns & Refund
Returns accepted within 30 days of delivery.
Damaged or Defective Item
Free return shipping + replacement or full refund
Wrong Item Received
Free return shipping + replacement or full refund
Change of Mind
Return shipping at customer's expense · 25% restocking fee applies
Payment Option
We Hold These Truths To Be Selfevident... So Begins The U.S. Declaration Of Independence. What Follows Those Words Is A Ringing Endorsement Of Universal Rights, But It Is Far From Selfevident. Why Did The Authors Claim That It Was? William Talbott Suggests That They Were Trapped By A Presupposition Of Enlightenment Philosophy: That There Was Only One Way To Rationally Justify Universal Truths, By Proving Them From Selfevident Premises.With The Benefit Of Hindsight, It Is Clear That The Authors Of The U.S. Declaration Had No Infallible Source Of Moral Truth. For Example, Many Of The Authors Of The Declaration Of Independence Endorsed Slavery. The Wrongness Of Slavery Was Not Selfevident; It Was A Moral Discovery.In This Book, William Talbott Builds On The Work Of John Rawls, Jrgen Habermas, J.S. Mill, Amartya Sen, And Henry Shue To Explain How, Over The Course Of History, Human Beings Have Learned How To Adopt A Distinctively Moral Point Of View From Which It Is Possible To Make Universal, Though Not Infallible, Judgments Of Right And Wrong. He Explains How This Distinctively Moral Point Of View Has Led To The Discovery Of The Moral Importance Of Nine Basic Rights.Undoubtedly, The Most Controversial Issue Raised By The Claim Of Universal Rights Is The Issue Of Moral Relativism. How Can The Advocate Of Universal Rights Avoid Being A Moral Imperialist? In This Book, Talbott Shows How To Defend Basic Individual Rights From A Universal Moral Point Of View That Is Neither Imperialistic Nor Relativistic. Talbott Avoids Moral Imperialism By Insisting That All Of Us, Himself Included, Have Moral Blindspots And That We Usually Depend On Others To Help Us To Identify Those Blindspots.Talbott'S Book Speaks To Not Only Debates On Human Rights But To Broader Issues Of Moral And Cultural Relativism, And Will Interest A Broad Range Of Readers.
⚠️ WARNING (California Proposition 65):
This product may contain chemicals known to the State of California to cause cancer, birth defects, or other reproductive harm.
For more information, please visit www.P65Warnings.ca.gov.
- Q: What is the page count of the book? A: This book contains two hundred fifty-six pages. It provides an in-depth exploration of universal rights and moral philosophy.
- Q: What are the dimensions of the book? A: The book measures nine point one inches in length, zero point seven inches in width, and nine point two five inches in height. These dimensions make it a convenient size for reading.
- Q: What type of binding does this book have? A: This book is available in paperback binding. Paperback editions are typically more flexible and lightweight than hardcover versions.
- Q: Who is the author of this book? A: The author of this book is William Talbott. He explores complex themes around universal rights and moral perspectives.
- Q: What is the main genre of this book? A: This book falls under the political genre. It addresses issues surrounding human rights and moral philosophy.
- Q: How do I use this book for study? A: You can use this book for academic study or personal exploration of moral philosophy. It is suitable for readers interested in human rights and ethical discussions.
- Q: Is this book suitable for beginners in philosophy? A: Yes, this book is suitable for beginners. It explains complex ideas in an accessible manner, making it a good starting point.
- Q: What themes are covered in this book? A: This book covers themes of universal rights, moral relativism, and moral philosophy. It engages with historical perspectives on these topics.
- Q: How should I care for this book? A: To keep this book in good condition, store it in a dry place and avoid exposing it to direct sunlight. Handling it with clean hands can also help preserve its quality.
- Q: Is this book safe for all ages? A: Yes, this book is appropriate for a wide range of readers. However, its themes may be more suitable for older teens and adults.
- Q: What should I do if my book arrives damaged? A: If your book arrives damaged, you should contact the seller for a return or replacement. Be sure to provide details and photos of the damage.
- Q: What if I need help understanding the content? A: You can seek help from study groups or online forums focused on philosophy. Additionally, supplemental resources may provide further insights into the material.
- Q: Can I return this book if I don't like it? A: Yes, most retailers offer a return policy for books. Check the specific return guidelines of the seller for timeframes and conditions.
- Q: How does this book compare to other works on human rights? A: This book offers a unique perspective by combining historical analysis with philosophical inquiry. It is distinct from other works that may focus solely on legal aspects.
- Q: What is the main argument of this book? A: The main argument of this book is that universal rights are not self-evident but are discovered through moral reasoning. The author challenges conventional views on rights.
- Q: Does the book include references to other philosophers? A: Yes, the book references prominent philosophers such as John Rawls and J.S. Mill. These references help contextualize the discussions on moral philosophy.